By: Gossip Journalist
The Hathian Observer received the following letter for which have full permission to investigate and publish. For the awareness of our readers, this article follows on from the incident described HERE where one HPD Officer appeared to have used forced on a citizen who had surrendered. We understand that characterisation however is disputed by the HPD and so far, we have not been able to locate Officer Doe for questions (if she consents).
We wish to note that this article contains details of a graphic nature. Reader discretion, is advised.
A Letter With A Lot of Detail
Dear Editor,
Regarding article in the Hathian Observer regarding the exploitation of Carlos Montoya by Officer Sharkie Doe.
I was not at the hospital the day of the incident. But I do have information leading up to the brutal attack on my husband after he was handcuffed and on his knees. He was completely subdued when Officer Doe, drew her weapon and shot him in the back of the calf.
Officer Doe reported allegedly being raped by Carlos and myself. A report that HPD accepted with zero evidence or proof. He was arrested, and she shot him in the calf after the arrest.
I do have information and photos however that will prove her claim of rape is a lie. Officer Doe, my husband and myself had a threesome. I have photos where she is slurping my my husbands member as if it is candy. Also one of her riding his face so vehemently, that she nearly suffocated him, and I had to perform CPR to get him back! She left a snail trail of jism on my sofa, over my carpet and down the hall! When we didn’t invite her back the next day… she took offense!
Her charge of rape is a LIE, and has defamed my husbands reputation in the community. This LIE is covered up by the HPD and he was arrested. I can only assume there is still a warrant out for me as well? My coming forward to you to expose this may get me arrested. But I will risk it to bring this continue heinous police abuse to light.
Please find some photos. Does this look like rape?
Mrs. Keisha Montoya
Slime Trails & The Truth
Hathian has never been a city that struggles with rumours. It struggles with what to do after they start.
In the days since an HPD officer opened fire on a handcuffed man outside Hathian General Hospital (‘HGH’), an incident the HPD has publicly framed as justified the city’s rumour mill has been spinning fast enough to power the lights so that the next storm can’t do any damage. So now, this new and uncomfortable tip sent to the Observer has pushed the story out of the squad room and the street rumour mill and straight into the bedroom. There it stays (slurping on candy – Ed).
As readers can see from the note, it claims that the official explanation behind the shooting, namely, an allegation of sexual assault levelled against the injured man, is not merely false, but a deliberate fabrication used to retroactively justify the use of force. Also probably sex regrets, but we’ll get to that.
According to Mrs. Montoya, our letter writer, the officer involved had previously engaged in a consensual sexual encounter with both her and her husband, an encounter she alleges was captured on her home CCTV. The letter goes on to describe explicit acts, offered not for titillation, she says, but to underscore consent and familiarity with her husband (his face and dick, let’s be clear – Ed).
“This was not rape,” she writes. “This was a threesome.”
The implication is as explosive as it is unsettling: that a consensual encounter later curdled into accusation, arrest, and ultimately, a bullet, fired after the suspect was already restrained.
HPD has not publicly released evidence supporting the rape allegation that we understand was filed against Mr. Montoya. No medical findings, no corroborating witness statements, and no forensic results have been disclosed. What has been confirmed is that the suspect was almost in custody and on his knees, when he was shot, by Doe.
The letter now circulating raises a corrosive question: Was the accusation itself a shield?
Mrs. Montoya’s note suggests motive, resentment, embarrassment, rejection of future candy shop activity, but stops short of alleging premeditation. Instead, it paints a picture of a personal grievance escalated into professional retaliation, then quietly sanctified by institutional silence.
“I will risk being arrested to expose this,” she writes, acknowledging that coming forward may place her in legal jeopardy.
This allegation arrives in a city already uneasy with HPD’s conduct, already questioning how often violence is explained after the fact, and already aware of how quickly certain narratives are accepted when a badge is involved. Hathian has been warned before about believing neat explanations for messy events. This one is anything but neat. It’s definitely messy though, (Slimy? – Ed).
